From 75d3593376becacd0905a3e43eb32d7d1cc8fbb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Danny Kim Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 15:35:17 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Author replies (#5) The reviewer drops a finding the author has answered in the PR comments as intended or a false alarm, once the code or docs make that clear. Pairs with memona's merge-branch gate loop. Reviewed-on: https://git.capsulizers.com/commons/bot-agents/pulls/5 Co-authored-by: Danny Kim Co-committed-by: Danny Kim --- prompt.md | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/prompt.md b/prompt.md index 5605b14..ba0f4f5 100644 --- a/prompt.md +++ b/prompt.md @@ -31,9 +31,11 @@ about to post, whether you reviewed yourself or relayed a reviewer subagent. Its first line must be exactly the template's verdict and nothing else: `Yes`, `No`, or `With fixes`. `Yes` approves and the other two request changes; any other first line is posted as a plain comment, which wastes the run. Minor issues -alone never block. When the verdict is not `Yes`, the second line names what -must change in one line, addressed to the author; the author's own agent picks -the fixes up, so never ask `@bot` to make them. For UI changes, check that the +alone never block, and neither does a finding the author has answered in the +comment history below as intended or a false alarm, once the code or docs make +that clear. When the verdict is not `Yes`, the second line names what must +change in one line, addressed to the author; the author's own agent picks the +fixes up, so never ask `@bot` to make them. For UI changes, check that the result is aligned, clean, and pixel-perfect, and that included screenshots prove the intended result was achieved.