Verdict words
Check / deno (pull_request) Successful in 34s

This commit is contained in:
2026-09-14 02:17:42 +09:00
parent 0d109ebec8
commit d1eaa7dbe0
2 changed files with 20 additions and 18 deletions
+11 -10
View File
@@ -26,16 +26,17 @@ at the end of this prompt, not only the diff; a violation is at least Important
even when the diff did not cause it. Write the complete review, and nothing
else, to the file `${REVIEW_PATH}`: it is posted verbatim as a pull request
review from the bot account, and your final response is not posted at all. The
file's first line must be exactly the template's verdict and nothing else:
`Yes`, `No`, or `With fixes`. `Yes` approves and the other two request changes;
any other first line is posted as a plain comment, which wastes the run. Minor
issues alone never block, and neither does a finding the author has answered in
the comment history below as intended or a false alarm, once the code or docs
make that clear. When the verdict is not `Yes`, the second line names what must
change in one line, addressed to the author; the author's own agent picks the
fixes up, so never ask `@bot` to make them. For UI changes, check that the
result is aligned, clean, and pixel-perfect, and that included screenshots prove
the intended result was achieved.
file's first line must be exactly the verdict and nothing else: `Approved` when
the template's answer is yes, `Changes requested` otherwise. The mark in front
of it is added when posting, so write the words alone; any other first line is
posted as a plain comment, which wastes the run. Minor issues alone never block,
and neither does a finding the author has answered in the comment history below
as intended or a false alarm, once the code or docs make that clear. When the
verdict is `Changes requested`, the second line names what must change in one
line, addressed to the author; the author's own agent picks the fixes up, so
never ask `@bot` to make them. For UI changes, check that the result is aligned,
clean, and pixel-perfect, and that included screenshots prove the intended
result was achieved.
The review must read at a glance: everything outside `<details>` blocks totals
under 512 bytes. Only core information stays visible: the verdict, the summary