Compare commits
1 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| c8f325e048 |
@@ -18,8 +18,7 @@ the head of the pull request when there is one, with full history and the
|
|||||||
author's push credentials. Read the code there, run its checks and tests when
|
author's push credentials. Read the code there, run its checks and tests when
|
||||||
they bear on the task, and push from there.
|
they bear on the task, and push from there.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For a `pull_request` event, and for a comment on a pull request that asks you to
|
For a `pull_request` event, review the PR without changing code, using the
|
||||||
review it, review the PR without changing code, using the
|
|
||||||
`requesting-code-review` skill from superpowers: run its code reviewer template
|
`requesting-code-review` skill from superpowers: run its code reviewer template
|
||||||
against the PR's base and head. Run the project's checks on the head and treat a
|
against the PR's base and head. Run the project's checks on the head and treat a
|
||||||
failure as at least Important. Check the whole repository against the code rules
|
failure as at least Important. Check the whole repository against the code rules
|
||||||
@@ -27,17 +26,16 @@ at the end of this prompt, not only the diff; a violation is at least Important
|
|||||||
even when the diff did not cause it. Write the complete review, and nothing
|
even when the diff did not cause it. Write the complete review, and nothing
|
||||||
else, to the file `${REVIEW_PATH}`: it is posted verbatim as a pull request
|
else, to the file `${REVIEW_PATH}`: it is posted verbatim as a pull request
|
||||||
review from the bot account, and your final response is not posted at all. The
|
review from the bot account, and your final response is not posted at all. The
|
||||||
file's first line must be exactly the verdict and nothing else: `Approved` when
|
file's first line must be exactly the template's verdict and nothing else:
|
||||||
the template's answer is yes, `Changes requested` otherwise. The mark in front
|
`Yes`, `No`, or `With fixes`. `Yes` approves and the other two request changes;
|
||||||
of it is added when posting, so write the words alone; any other first line is
|
any other first line is posted as a plain comment, which wastes the run. Minor
|
||||||
posted as a plain comment, which wastes the run. Minor issues alone never block,
|
issues alone never block, and neither does a finding the author has answered in
|
||||||
and neither does a finding the author has answered in the comment history below
|
the comment history below as intended or a false alarm, once the code or docs
|
||||||
as intended or a false alarm, once the code or docs make that clear. When the
|
make that clear. When the verdict is not `Yes`, the second line names what must
|
||||||
verdict is `Changes requested`, the second line names what must change in one
|
change in one line, addressed to the author; the author's own agent picks the
|
||||||
line, addressed to the author; the author's own agent picks the fixes up, so
|
fixes up, so never ask `@bot` to make them. For UI changes, check that the
|
||||||
never ask `@bot` to make them. For UI changes, check that the result is aligned,
|
result is aligned, clean, and pixel-perfect, and that included screenshots prove
|
||||||
clean, and pixel-perfect, and that included screenshots prove the intended
|
the intended result was achieved.
|
||||||
result was achieved.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The review must read at a glance: everything outside `<details>` blocks totals
|
The review must read at a glance: everything outside `<details>` blocks totals
|
||||||
under 512 bytes. Only core information stays visible: the verdict, the summary
|
under 512 bytes. Only core information stays visible: the verdict, the summary
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -59,30 +59,26 @@ async function postComment(body: string): Promise<void> {
|
|||||||
});
|
});
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// A review is posted whenever the agent wrote one, whether a review request or
|
// A pull request event is a review request, so the review is posted instead
|
||||||
// a comment asked for it. It comes through a file, because a final chat message
|
// of the response. It comes through a file, because a final chat message picks
|
||||||
// picks up narration while a file's first line is written on purpose. That line
|
// up narration while a file's first line is written on purpose. That line is
|
||||||
// is the verdict, matched whole; anything unexpected only comments, never
|
// the verdict; anything unexpected only comments, never approves.
|
||||||
// approves. The mark in front is added here, so it is never part of the match.
|
|
||||||
const REVIEW_PATH = `${await Deno.makeTempDir()}/review.md`;
|
const REVIEW_PATH = `${await Deno.makeTempDir()}/review.md`;
|
||||||
const VERDICTS: Record<string, [event: string, mark: string]> = {
|
const VERDICTS: Record<string, string> = {
|
||||||
Approved: ["APPROVED", "✅"],
|
Yes: "APPROVED",
|
||||||
"Changes requested": ["REQUEST_CHANGES", "🛑"],
|
No: "REQUEST_CHANGES",
|
||||||
|
"With fixes": "REQUEST_CHANGES",
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
async function postResult(body: string): Promise<void> {
|
async function postResult(body: string): Promise<void> {
|
||||||
const review = await Deno.readTextFile(REVIEW_PATH).catch(() => null);
|
if (EVENT !== "pull_request") return postComment(body);
|
||||||
if (review === null) {
|
const review = await Deno.readTextFile(REVIEW_PATH).catch(() => {
|
||||||
if (EVENT === "pull_request") {
|
|
||||||
throw new Error(`no review was written to ${REVIEW_PATH}`);
|
throw new Error(`no review was written to ${REVIEW_PATH}`);
|
||||||
}
|
});
|
||||||
return postComment(body);
|
const [verdict] = review.split("\n", 1);
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
const [verdict, ...rest] = review.split("\n");
|
|
||||||
const [event, mark] = VERDICTS[verdict.trim()] ?? ["COMMENT", "💬"];
|
|
||||||
await gitea(REVIEWER_TOKEN, `repos/${REPO}/pulls/${INDEX}/reviews`, {
|
await gitea(REVIEWER_TOKEN, `repos/${REPO}/pulls/${INDEX}/reviews`, {
|
||||||
body: stripAnsi([`${mark} ${verdict.trim()}`, ...rest].join("\n")),
|
body: stripAnsi(review),
|
||||||
event,
|
event: VERDICTS[verdict.trim()] ?? "COMMENT",
|
||||||
});
|
});
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user